<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hubris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidhenderson.com/2008/06/29/hubris/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2008/06/29/hubris/</link>
	<description>author, journalist, media strategist</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: [name withheld at request]</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2008/06/29/hubris/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>[name withheld at request]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/blog/?p=250#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>There are few things more offensive to me than the guy who thinks the rules do not apply to him because he is important.  I make a distinction between that guy and the guy who thinks the rule shouldn't apply to anyone, or who is sincerely ignorant of the rules. 
 
Perhaps the most shocking thing is that he drops off his own dry cleaning.  I figured he had staff for that.
 
When I watched him looking into the camera saying that Clinton would win, long after it was clear that she could not win, I winced because it was all very unhelpful to Obama (my candidate) and to the country and the quality of our discourse, which already is abysmal.  That said, I was in some perverse way impressed that he could keep doing it, keep saying these things before tens of millions of people, millions of whom knew that he didn't believe a word of it.   Impressed in a very narrow way - this was not something I think is good or desirable, just hard to do.
 
I don't share your cynicism, at least not your level of cynicism, about our politics and government, for one reason:  while manifestly imperfect, this country is infinitely perfectible, and is based on a constitution that actively provides for that "perfection" as a verb, a continuing process that never quite gets to its end, but (so far) has never irretrievably extinguished the hope of progress in that direction.  It's a process that has ups and downs. I feel like we potentially are finishing one of the major downs and perhaps entering (next January) what might be at least a minor up.
 
I certainly have the experience of a cynic, but I try, with limited success, to have the discipline of a idealist without illusions.   Have been trying to figure this out since about 1972.  Still working on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are few things more offensive to me than the guy who thinks the rules do not apply to him because he is important.  I make a distinction between that guy and the guy who thinks the rule shouldn&#8217;t apply to anyone, or who is sincerely ignorant of the rules. </p>
<p>Perhaps the most shocking thing is that he drops off his own dry cleaning.  I figured he had staff for that.</p>
<p>When I watched him looking into the camera saying that Clinton would win, long after it was clear that she could not win, I winced because it was all very unhelpful to Obama (my candidate) and to the country and the quality of our discourse, which already is abysmal.  That said, I was in some perverse way impressed that he could keep doing it, keep saying these things before tens of millions of people, millions of whom knew that he didn&#8217;t believe a word of it.   Impressed in a very narrow way - this was not something I think is good or desirable, just hard to do.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t share your cynicism, at least not your level of cynicism, about our politics and government, for one reason:  while manifestly imperfect, this country is infinitely perfectible, and is based on a constitution that actively provides for that &#8220;perfection&#8221; as a verb, a continuing process that never quite gets to its end, but (so far) has never irretrievably extinguished the hope of progress in that direction.  It&#8217;s a process that has ups and downs. I feel like we potentially are finishing one of the major downs and perhaps entering (next January) what might be at least a minor up.</p>
<p>I certainly have the experience of a cynic, but I try, with limited success, to have the discipline of a idealist without illusions.   Have been trying to figure this out since about 1972.  Still working on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2008/06/29/hubris/#comment-1263</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/blog/?p=250#comment-1263</guid>
		<description>It's true..McAuliffe is the democratic devil incarnate.
Perhaps right up there with Karl Rove.  I'm a dem...but
McAuliffe and his ways are no longer applicable to the politics Obama is trying to bring about.  He needs insiders to get the job done.  But I truly hope McAuliffe is not a part of the team.  Pleeeeze!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true..McAuliffe is the democratic devil incarnate.<br />
Perhaps right up there with Karl Rove.  I&#8217;m a dem&#8230;but<br />
McAuliffe and his ways are no longer applicable to the politics Obama is trying to bring about.  He needs insiders to get the job done.  But I truly hope McAuliffe is not a part of the team.  Pleeeeze!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Mondschein</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2008/06/29/hubris/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Mondschein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/blog/?p=250#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>Sad, but so true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad, but so true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
