<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Die Press Release!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=die-press-release</link>
	<description>Writer, communications strategist, Emmy Award winning former CBS News correspondent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: When should I send that press release? Does it even matter? &#124; vojtechpr</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>When should I send that press release? Does it even matter? &#124; vojtechpr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3104#comment-3359</guid>
		<description>[...] blog. &#8220;It no longer works,&#8221; writes David about press releases in &#8220;Die Press Release!!!&#8221; In another blog post he says: &#8220;So, when your organization spends hours of valuable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog. &#8220;It no longer works,&#8221; writes David about press releases in &#8220;Die Press Release!!!&#8221; In another blog post he says: &#8220;So, when your organization spends hours of valuable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bray</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/#comment-2953</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3104#comment-2953</guid>
		<description>Check out QuickNewsBits.com, an alternative to newswire distribution services like PR Newswire/Businesswire; a new way to share news via short-form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out QuickNewsBits.com, an alternative to newswire distribution services like PR Newswire/Businesswire; a new way to share news via short-form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the Press Release Dead &#124; Publicity Power Coach Monique Caradine</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/#comment-2728</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the Press Release Dead &#124; Publicity Power Coach Monique Caradine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3104#comment-2728</guid>
		<description>[...] and former award-winning CBS Correspondent.  The title of one of his most recent posts was:  Die Press Release!!!  If you’re a PR exec or DIY publicity seeker it is definitely worth the read.  In part David [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and former award-winning CBS Correspondent.  The title of one of his most recent posts was:  Die Press Release!!!  If you’re a PR exec or DIY publicity seeker it is definitely worth the read.  In part David [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Marx</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/#comment-2718</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Marx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3104#comment-2718</guid>
		<description>Great discussion going here. As someone noted, poorly written press releases should be killed and in fact are stillborn. What has changed is that press releases have morphed into consumer- or client-generated vehicles. Written to maximize the power of search engines, they can be effective in getting leads directly and bypassing the media. 

As for the traditional role of releases, written well, they can still be a succinct way of telling your story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great discussion going here. As someone noted, poorly written press releases should be killed and in fact are stillborn. What has changed is that press releases have morphed into consumer- or client-generated vehicles. Written to maximize the power of search engines, they can be effective in getting leads directly and bypassing the media. </p>
<p>As for the traditional role of releases, written well, they can still be a succinct way of telling your story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/#comment-2715</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3104#comment-2715</guid>
		<description>I may be one of the few people agreeing with you on the follow-up phone call.  Having been in the shoes on both sides--a reporter and assignment editor, and for 15 years now a PR person--I know how often that follow-up phone call was annoying.  Most of the time, for the reason you mention, David; it was just a &quot;did you get it?&quot; call, or it was a second attempt to pitch a story I&#039;d already...pitched, myself.

Thinking about what&#039;s going on in newsrooms nowadays, that call seems even more insensitive.  (And I wonder if the thank-yous people here are getting are sincere or sarcastic.)  There are so few staff in newsrooms anymore that most people are doing about 3 or 4 jobs, with little or no time to fend off all the PR people who would be calling them if every press release generated a follow-up call.  

Fact is, if your email has a pithy subject line (not catchy, but substantive) and your email is succinct and clear, and your story actually worth covering, you will get coverage without nagging someone to take a second look at that release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be one of the few people agreeing with you on the follow-up phone call.  Having been in the shoes on both sides&#8211;a reporter and assignment editor, and for 15 years now a PR person&#8211;I know how often that follow-up phone call was annoying.  Most of the time, for the reason you mention, David; it was just a &#8220;did you get it?&#8221; call, or it was a second attempt to pitch a story I&#8217;d already&#8230;pitched, myself.</p>
<p>Thinking about what&#8217;s going on in newsrooms nowadays, that call seems even more insensitive.  (And I wonder if the thank-yous people here are getting are sincere or sarcastic.)  There are so few staff in newsrooms anymore that most people are doing about 3 or 4 jobs, with little or no time to fend off all the PR people who would be calling them if every press release generated a follow-up call.  </p>
<p>Fact is, if your email has a pithy subject line (not catchy, but substantive) and your email is succinct and clear, and your story actually worth covering, you will get coverage without nagging someone to take a second look at that release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Streed, APR</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Streed, APR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3104#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>Very interesting thread, with some wonderful insights. It seems to me that the news release is just another communication tool for us to use or abuse.  I think the keys, as others have said, are the relationship with the journalist and the quality of the information. If the news release is a tool they like or prefer, use it. If not, find their preferred channel and use it. With the advent of microblogging, a short, 140-character summary might be enough for a journalist who follows you to call or contact you for the story. It&#039;s the &quot;pull&quot; not &quot;push&quot; approach that seems so prevalent today. The poorly written press release (as defined earlier by Julian) SHOULD die, but the well written news release should remain an old-school tool to use in those relationships that welcome it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting thread, with some wonderful insights. It seems to me that the news release is just another communication tool for us to use or abuse.  I think the keys, as others have said, are the relationship with the journalist and the quality of the information. If the news release is a tool they like or prefer, use it. If not, find their preferred channel and use it. With the advent of microblogging, a short, 140-character summary might be enough for a journalist who follows you to call or contact you for the story. It&#8217;s the &#8220;pull&#8221; not &#8220;push&#8221; approach that seems so prevalent today. The poorly written press release (as defined earlier by Julian) SHOULD die, but the well written news release should remain an old-school tool to use in those relationships that welcome it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorne Pike</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorne Pike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3104#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>The old cookie-cutter, standard release is indeed dying, but then again, any cookie-cutter approach to communications is in serious trouble. Generating an irresistibly compelling idea is still the best way to get coverage, and just planting it in front of the right media is often enough to start the wheels rolling. But I agree with many of the comments here: the follow-up phone call is a vital way to get feedback and give more detail, and to make sure the email didn&#039;t get lost in a spam filter or the pile that happened to come in that day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old cookie-cutter, standard release is indeed dying, but then again, any cookie-cutter approach to communications is in serious trouble. Generating an irresistibly compelling idea is still the best way to get coverage, and just planting it in front of the right media is often enough to start the wheels rolling. But I agree with many of the comments here: the follow-up phone call is a vital way to get feedback and give more detail, and to make sure the email didn&#8217;t get lost in a spam filter or the pile that happened to come in that day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Bray</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Bray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3104#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>My background has been shaped by broadcasting, printjournalism, marketing and PR. Back in the 1970&#039;s the BBC decreed that press conferences would be termed news conferences and the press releases would be termed a news release. sadlt the current generation have forgotten this and reverted back to the idea of a press release etc., The writer is wrong, simply journalists these days are wedded to computers, many don&#039;t socialise,  don&#039;t get out news gathering, making contacts, building relationships. I have countless cuttings whre the content of the news release has been lifted verbatim, so that blows another hole in the writers point of view. Also bear in mind the PR is not in the business to serve the journalist, the salary is paid by the client and the PR works to an agreed brief to get certain defined messages or information over, press cuttings are picked up by external contracts (and copyright fees) paid on those cuttings! in the UK that is. There is no way i&#039;d hand my client lock stock and barrel over to a journalist and many is the time when the friendly journalist has offered his/ her cut price editorial services to the client, and during one memorable jolly the journalist slightly tipsy kept pestering the client right in front of me!

Any ifd not convinced I&#039;ve set up a do it yourself news release kit on www.eventandroadshowplanners.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My background has been shaped by broadcasting, printjournalism, marketing and PR. Back in the 1970&#8242;s the BBC decreed that press conferences would be termed news conferences and the press releases would be termed a news release. sadlt the current generation have forgotten this and reverted back to the idea of a press release etc., The writer is wrong, simply journalists these days are wedded to computers, many don&#8217;t socialise,  don&#8217;t get out news gathering, making contacts, building relationships. I have countless cuttings whre the content of the news release has been lifted verbatim, so that blows another hole in the writers point of view. Also bear in mind the PR is not in the business to serve the journalist, the salary is paid by the client and the PR works to an agreed brief to get certain defined messages or information over, press cuttings are picked up by external contracts (and copyright fees) paid on those cuttings! in the UK that is. There is no way i&#8217;d hand my client lock stock and barrel over to a journalist and many is the time when the friendly journalist has offered his/ her cut price editorial services to the client, and during one memorable jolly the journalist slightly tipsy kept pestering the client right in front of me!</p>
<p>Any ifd not convinced I&#8217;ve set up a do it yourself news release kit on <a href="http://www.eventandroadshowplanners.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.eventandroadshowplanners.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gury</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 03:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3104#comment-2694</guid>
		<description>David -- I just penned these thoughts on a LinkedIn group PR site that linked to your excellent &quot;Die Press Release!&quot; idea, but I thought I&#039;d paste it here since this is where all the action seems to be.  Regards, Michael Gury

*   *   *

Lots of compliments on these thoughts.  Mine, and I&#039;m going to come at it as a corporate person responsible for press relations: 1. A press release in gestation is a forcing mechanism.  It forces everyone in the organization to articulate what the news is or is not.  You&#039;d be surprised at what has been previously briefed to the press officer doesn&#039;t actually exist.  Seeing a big fat headline in a release draft will scare the daylights out of the meek and some internal truth will emerge.  2.  If in fact there is a shred of truth in the announcement, but the troops haven&#039;t been mobilized to execute, a global release on Business Wire will quickly get them mobilized.  3.  Most product, service and customer win releases have terrific value in the hands of the sales force.  Frankly, their greatest value is often as marketing communications deliverables.  If wordy, gorp-laden brochures are the standard (see Circular File), then a 1.2 page concise press release will stand tall and the sales team will love it.  Doesn&#039;t matter where you released it or placed it, as long as they have a copy, they&#039;ll use it.  4.  And to the same point, employees like to know that stuff is going on, and even if the news is not good, we communications people know how to use the same words to tell the employees, shareholders, etc., what&#039;s going on ahead of time.  5.  I&#039;ve always sent a copy of a press release that I distribute to a carefully-built list of journalists within seconds of posting it -- with a personal note that explains what it means.  As suggested by this thread, most releases have no real value to journalists.  So I always send the release to them and say this means this or that, and I essentially toss out story ideas.  It&#039;s actually fairly liberating.  Once the release has been tortured by however many internal authorities and blessed, I can finally go to my people on the list and say, &quot;you know what?  Here&#039;s what it means.&quot;  When I started doing this, my phone started ringing.  Just posting a release and then walking away?  -- nothing (unless the news was bad, really confusing and/or it was earnings time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8212; I just penned these thoughts on a LinkedIn group PR site that linked to your excellent &#8220;Die Press Release!&#8221; idea, but I thought I&#8217;d paste it here since this is where all the action seems to be.  Regards, Michael Gury</p>
<p>*   *   *</p>
<p>Lots of compliments on these thoughts.  Mine, and I&#8217;m going to come at it as a corporate person responsible for press relations: 1. A press release in gestation is a forcing mechanism.  It forces everyone in the organization to articulate what the news is or is not.  You&#8217;d be surprised at what has been previously briefed to the press officer doesn&#8217;t actually exist.  Seeing a big fat headline in a release draft will scare the daylights out of the meek and some internal truth will emerge.  2.  If in fact there is a shred of truth in the announcement, but the troops haven&#8217;t been mobilized to execute, a global release on Business Wire will quickly get them mobilized.  3.  Most product, service and customer win releases have terrific value in the hands of the sales force.  Frankly, their greatest value is often as marketing communications deliverables.  If wordy, gorp-laden brochures are the standard (see Circular File), then a 1.2 page concise press release will stand tall and the sales team will love it.  Doesn&#8217;t matter where you released it or placed it, as long as they have a copy, they&#8217;ll use it.  4.  And to the same point, employees like to know that stuff is going on, and even if the news is not good, we communications people know how to use the same words to tell the employees, shareholders, etc., what&#8217;s going on ahead of time.  5.  I&#8217;ve always sent a copy of a press release that I distribute to a carefully-built list of journalists within seconds of posting it &#8212; with a personal note that explains what it means.  As suggested by this thread, most releases have no real value to journalists.  So I always send the release to them and say this means this or that, and I essentially toss out story ideas.  It&#8217;s actually fairly liberating.  Once the release has been tortured by however many internal authorities and blessed, I can finally go to my people on the list and say, &#8220;you know what?  Here&#8217;s what it means.&#8221;  When I started doing this, my phone started ringing.  Just posting a release and then walking away?  &#8212; nothing (unless the news was bad, really confusing and/or it was earnings time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reporter No More</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/03/31/die-press-release/#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>Reporter No More</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3104#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>I find it so troubling how reporters act as if they are celebrities and rock stars. There are few &quot;hungry&quot; reporters left! I tire of hearing from reporters who can only tell PR profs what they DON&#039;T want them to do: Don&#039;t Call. Don&#039;t follow up. Don&#039;t look me in the eyes when you&#039;re addressing me. There was a time when being a reporter was a noble profession in which reporters were hungry for a story and could read between the lines of a fluff press release and get a bang up story that got sent around the country. I know because I&#039;ve done it. Of course that was long before the bloggers, Twitterers and 24 hour Headline news!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it so troubling how reporters act as if they are celebrities and rock stars. There are few &#8220;hungry&#8221; reporters left! I tire of hearing from reporters who can only tell PR profs what they DON&#8217;T want them to do: Don&#8217;t Call. Don&#8217;t follow up. Don&#8217;t look me in the eyes when you&#8217;re addressing me. There was a time when being a reporter was a noble profession in which reporters were hungry for a story and could read between the lines of a fluff press release and get a bang up story that got sent around the country. I know because I&#8217;ve done it. Of course that was long before the bloggers, Twitterers and 24 hour Headline news!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: media.davidhenderson.com

Served from: www.davidhenderson.com @ 2012-05-21 04:38:39 -->
