<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good and Bad about a NewsHour Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/08/20/good-and-bad-about-a-newshour-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/08/20/good-and-bad-about-a-newshour-interview/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=good-and-bad-about-a-newshour-interview</link>
	<description>Writer, communications strategist, Emmy Award winning former CBS News correspondent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:41:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mort Persky</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/08/20/good-and-bad-about-a-newshour-interview/#comment-3305</link>
		<dc:creator>Mort Persky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3801#comment-3305</guid>
		<description>Absolutely, alleged experts who either don&#039;t know the answers or evade them on purpose are part of the News Hour&#039;s weakest link -- who it&#039;s interviewing today. There are quite a few pitfalls along the road to quizzing &quot;experts&quot; or, just as often, merely advocates. As a viewer, I too often wonder what story the advocates have been chosen to tell. Is it &quot;both sides,&quot; which seems to be the mantra -- in which case, a side that may be out-and-out wrong has to be given equal time? Or -- opposite problem -- do the panelists represent only one side of a story with two or three sides that need telling? (Or are they simply the two or three people who happened to be available today?) And finally, a question the networks rub in your face, but I want never to ask about PBS -- why these choices? So go my thoughts while watching the News Hour, and so, alas, I&#039;m watching it less. The program&#039;s long suit, I think, is that whoever&#039;s sitting there, its enviable team of smart interviewers will probably ask the right questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely, alleged experts who either don&#8217;t know the answers or evade them on purpose are part of the News Hour&#8217;s weakest link &#8212; who it&#8217;s interviewing today. There are quite a few pitfalls along the road to quizzing &#8220;experts&#8221; or, just as often, merely advocates. As a viewer, I too often wonder what story the advocates have been chosen to tell. Is it &#8220;both sides,&#8221; which seems to be the mantra &#8212; in which case, a side that may be out-and-out wrong has to be given equal time? Or &#8212; opposite problem &#8212; do the panelists represent only one side of a story with two or three sides that need telling? (Or are they simply the two or three people who happened to be available today?) And finally, a question the networks rub in your face, but I want never to ask about PBS &#8212; why these choices? So go my thoughts while watching the News Hour, and so, alas, I&#8217;m watching it less. The program&#8217;s long suit, I think, is that whoever&#8217;s sitting there, its enviable team of smart interviewers will probably ask the right questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/08/20/good-and-bad-about-a-newshour-interview/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=3801#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>As always, this is a great post, David. It&#039;s fun to get an insider&#039;s view of the media relations world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, this is a great post, David. It&#8217;s fun to get an insider&#8217;s view of the media relations world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

