<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe We&#8217;ve Got it Wrong, Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/09/07/maybe-weve-got-it-wrong-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/09/07/maybe-weve-got-it-wrong-again/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=maybe-weve-got-it-wrong-again</link>
	<description>Writer, communications strategist, Emmy Award winning former CBS News correspondent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:41:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Meyers</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/09/07/maybe-weve-got-it-wrong-again/#comment-3336</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Meyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=4006#comment-3336</guid>
		<description>When we learn to slow down and focus on what really matters, then we will realize that the tools are just the tools, and the connection is what&#039;s important.

Unfortunately, organizational momentum drives businesses right past that point, and they mostly only recognize in hindsight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we learn to slow down and focus on what really matters, then we will realize that the tools are just the tools, and the connection is what&#8217;s important.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, organizational momentum drives businesses right past that point, and they mostly only recognize in hindsight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Harte</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/09/07/maybe-weve-got-it-wrong-again/#comment-3325</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Harte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=4006#comment-3325</guid>
		<description>David, thank you for saying what many of us have been thinking. 

I remember that so-called article. And I clearly remember the rush for online stores and if memory serves, it was Eddie Bauer who leaped to closing down brick and mortar stores... Only to re-open them again. (And with that memory, I feel old. Thanks! ;-))

&quot;Part of the contemporary American work psyche is to seek quick fixes, regardless of downside risk...&quot;

Indeed. I remember fighting for websites to fix the waning requests for collateral; and direct mail to quickly fix advertising&#039;s downward spiral; and e-mail to quickly fix direct mail&#039;s lack of gusto, etc., etc. You get the picture.

But not one company ever addressed the REAL issue, which was, and continues to be, customer dissatisfaction or fulfilling actual market need (the &#039;if we build it they will come&#039; mentality is still vey much alive). 

I am tired of hearing that social media will replace marketing, that customers own the brand (The relationship, yes. The brand, no), etc. We need to stop trying to flush business/marketing/communications/PR fundamentals down the toilet and learn them first instead. 

Influence, intelligence and creativity will only be achieved with hard work. How many are willing? 

BTW, Dr. Mihaela Vorvoreanu, assistant professor, College of Technology, Purdue University, had a great post on communications (Conversational action vs. content action and lack of &quot;...research in communication &amp; persuasion about the concept of influence.&quot; i.e. the lack of understanding meaning in social media):  http://bit.ly/jdulj 

As Susan said, social media isn&#039;t the great frontier. And it&#039;s nothing new. There will always be snake oil salespeople who will take advantage of the companies looking for a quick fix. And there will always be companies who are in denial of what&#039;s truly going on in their marketplace. 

Tucking the soapbox away...

Beth Harte
Community Manager, MarketingProfs
@bethharte</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, thank you for saying what many of us have been thinking. </p>
<p>I remember that so-called article. And I clearly remember the rush for online stores and if memory serves, it was Eddie Bauer who leaped to closing down brick and mortar stores&#8230; Only to re-open them again. (And with that memory, I feel old. Thanks! <img src='http://www.davidhenderson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>&#8220;Part of the contemporary American work psyche is to seek quick fixes, regardless of downside risk&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed. I remember fighting for websites to fix the waning requests for collateral; and direct mail to quickly fix advertising&#8217;s downward spiral; and e-mail to quickly fix direct mail&#8217;s lack of gusto, etc., etc. You get the picture.</p>
<p>But not one company ever addressed the REAL issue, which was, and continues to be, customer dissatisfaction or fulfilling actual market need (the &#8216;if we build it they will come&#8217; mentality is still vey much alive). </p>
<p>I am tired of hearing that social media will replace marketing, that customers own the brand (The relationship, yes. The brand, no), etc. We need to stop trying to flush business/marketing/communications/PR fundamentals down the toilet and learn them first instead. </p>
<p>Influence, intelligence and creativity will only be achieved with hard work. How many are willing? </p>
<p>BTW, Dr. Mihaela Vorvoreanu, assistant professor, College of Technology, Purdue University, had a great post on communications (Conversational action vs. content action and lack of &#8220;&#8230;research in communication &amp; persuasion about the concept of influence.&#8221; i.e. the lack of understanding meaning in social media):  <a href="http://bit.ly/jdulj" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/jdulj</a> </p>
<p>As Susan said, social media isn&#8217;t the great frontier. And it&#8217;s nothing new. There will always be snake oil salespeople who will take advantage of the companies looking for a quick fix. And there will always be companies who are in denial of what&#8217;s truly going on in their marketplace. </p>
<p>Tucking the soapbox away&#8230;</p>
<p>Beth Harte<br />
Community Manager, MarketingProfs<br />
@bethharte</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Pennington</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/09/07/maybe-weve-got-it-wrong-again/#comment-3323</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Pennington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=4006#comment-3323</guid>
		<description>As a member of the echo chamber, I&#039;ll have to agree with Eric and say, &quot;thank you for wondering aloud.&quot; And with Susan, too: the great frontier is &quot;information AND context&quot; (all caps mine).

You&#039;ve raised a valid point:
&quot;When do we begin to learn that the Internet is a communications tool … a powerful conduit of information. In order to use it, one must first know something about effective communications. What brings influence, intelligence and creativity of the online world to life is how we use it to connect people into meaningful discussions, sharing and interface. And, here is the reality – it cannot be achieved effectively merely through fiberoptic cables.

A handshake and a glance in someone’s eyes is always far more powerful than an email or Twitter response. Additionally, having an interesting and legitimate story to tell is far more effective than self-promotional gimmicks.&quot;

Actually, you&#039;ve raised several valid points:
1. There&#039;s immense value IF social media brings people together face-to-face, especially around something that matters. (Somewhere along the way I heard that only 7% of communication consists of the words we use. The other 93% consists of things one needs to be present to comprehend.)
2. Having both an interesting and real story to tell is far better than just saying something a lot.
3. We&#039;re supersaturated with gimmicks. They&#039;re boring now.

Here&#039;s the challenge, it takes years (or if Gladwell&#039;s right, 10,000 hours) to become an expert in something else. You can download a free webinar and manual for only $197 and be an expert in social media tomorrow (and that&#039;s without even watching the webinar or reading the manual).

All of us crave to be an expert at something (or at least to be seen as an expert at something). It&#039;s just so easy to do it with social media.

Thankfully, there are contrarians like you amongst us. Contrary on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a member of the echo chamber, I&#8217;ll have to agree with Eric and say, &#8220;thank you for wondering aloud.&#8221; And with Susan, too: the great frontier is &#8220;information AND context&#8221; (all caps mine).</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve raised a valid point:<br />
&#8220;When do we begin to learn that the Internet is a communications tool … a powerful conduit of information. In order to use it, one must first know something about effective communications. What brings influence, intelligence and creativity of the online world to life is how we use it to connect people into meaningful discussions, sharing and interface. And, here is the reality – it cannot be achieved effectively merely through fiberoptic cables.</p>
<p>A handshake and a glance in someone’s eyes is always far more powerful than an email or Twitter response. Additionally, having an interesting and legitimate story to tell is far more effective than self-promotional gimmicks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, you&#8217;ve raised several valid points:<br />
1. There&#8217;s immense value IF social media brings people together face-to-face, especially around something that matters. (Somewhere along the way I heard that only 7% of communication consists of the words we use. The other 93% consists of things one needs to be present to comprehend.)<br />
2. Having both an interesting and real story to tell is far better than just saying something a lot.<br />
3. We&#8217;re supersaturated with gimmicks. They&#8217;re boring now.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the challenge, it takes years (or if Gladwell&#8217;s right, 10,000 hours) to become an expert in something else. You can download a free webinar and manual for only $197 and be an expert in social media tomorrow (and that&#8217;s without even watching the webinar or reading the manual).</p>
<p>All of us crave to be an expert at something (or at least to be seen as an expert at something). It&#8217;s just so easy to do it with social media.</p>
<p>Thankfully, there are contrarians like you amongst us. Contrary on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/09/07/maybe-weve-got-it-wrong-again/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=4006#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>You need to wonder aloud more often, David! It&#039;s all to easy for people to get wrapped up in hype, and forget about what&#039;s really important about the web - sure, it has changed how we communicate and influence. But there&#039;s a lot of other things going on out here too. Many people think that social media is the last great frontier of the Internet - it&#039;s not. Information and context (read: Semantic Web, linked data) are on the horizon. Another great shift is upon us - and where will the self-proclaimed social media gurus be then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to wonder aloud more often, David! It&#8217;s all to easy for people to get wrapped up in hype, and forget about what&#8217;s really important about the web &#8211; sure, it has changed how we communicate and influence. But there&#8217;s a lot of other things going on out here too. Many people think that social media is the last great frontier of the Internet &#8211; it&#8217;s not. Information and context (read: Semantic Web, linked data) are on the horizon. Another great shift is upon us &#8211; and where will the self-proclaimed social media gurus be then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Mondschein</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/09/07/maybe-weve-got-it-wrong-again/#comment-3320</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Mondschein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=4006#comment-3320</guid>
		<description>Thanks for wondering out loud. A much needed post for people to ruminate over and of course act upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for wondering out loud. A much needed post for people to ruminate over and of course act upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

