<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Washington Post&#8217;s Lack of Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/10/01/the-washington-posts-lack-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/10/01/the-washington-posts-lack-transparency/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-washington-posts-lack-transparency</link>
	<description>Writer, communications strategist, Emmy Award winning former CBS News correspondent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:41:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/10/01/the-washington-posts-lack-transparency/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=4108#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>I agree with the concept about work not being a democracy. But the key here is that if you don&#039;t pro-actively engage in dialogue that is at least bi-directional, and ideally multi-directional then you risk a lot, particularly if you are in the business of communicating.

If you are not willing to actively listen to others the what right do you have to expect them to listen to you? This could be a problem when your entire business model is based on people listening to you.

The difference between today and the past is that now people know that they can be heard, and those that chose to ignore them do so at considerable risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the concept about work not being a democracy. But the key here is that if you don&#8217;t pro-actively engage in dialogue that is at least bi-directional, and ideally multi-directional then you risk a lot, particularly if you are in the business of communicating.</p>
<p>If you are not willing to actively listen to others the what right do you have to expect them to listen to you? This could be a problem when your entire business model is based on people listening to you.</p>
<p>The difference between today and the past is that now people know that they can be heard, and those that chose to ignore them do so at considerable risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Chapel</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/10/01/the-washington-posts-lack-transparency/#comment-3357</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Chapel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=4108#comment-3357</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not about transparency. It&#039;s not about trusting employees. It is about organizational integrity. Period. 

I had a report once argue with me that work was a democracy. I fired her directly.

- Amanda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about transparency. It&#8217;s not about trusting employees. It is about organizational integrity. Period. </p>
<p>I had a report once argue with me that work was a democracy. I fired her directly.</p>
<p>- Amanda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Washington Post’s Lack of Transparency &#124; David Henderson - consultant, author, journalist -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2009/10/01/the-washington-posts-lack-transparency/#comment-3356</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Washington Post’s Lack of Transparency &#124; David Henderson - consultant, author, journalist -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=4108#comment-3356</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Debbie Weil. Debbie Weil said: Bad move RT WaPost fiercely restricts use of social media by its employees &amp; journalists. http://bit.ly/Nvlkf (via @davidhenderson) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Debbie Weil. Debbie Weil said: Bad move RT WaPost fiercely restricts use of social media by its employees &amp; journalists. <a href="http://bit.ly/Nvlkf" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Nvlkf</a> (via @davidhenderson) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

