Creating Confusion by “Rebranding” an Organization
Companies and organizations occasionally launch efforts to “rebrand” themselves. It usually occurs when sales and marketing efforts are flagging or there is a sense of aimlessness or malaise over strategic direction … a feeling that no one cares or is paying attention.
Before the Internet, companies would attempt to rebrand themselves with a new logo, letterhead and business cards. Other than that, it’d be pretty much business as usual, and nothing changed.
In the digital era, companies attempt to rebrand themselves with a new Web site in addition to new logo, letterhead and business cards, and, still, very little changes.
Vast amounts of time and money are spent on rebranding, doing things like debating fonts, colors, graphic standards, look and feel … and, that special quality that makes the rebranding team tingle with excitement. Yet, all too often, rebranding is akin to navel-gazing … it’s singularly about the company or organization when it should be about what audiences desire or need.
Think of a rebranding effort as trying to apply a bandaid to a massive wound. It requires more … much more.
An airline’s audience, for example, is mostly passengers. Passengers need consistently fair prices and more legroom – perennial top complaints of air travelers – not a new paint scheme on the exterior of the planes. Yet, airlines habitually focus on cosmetic rebranding attempts. Superficial and often expensive tactics.
While South Africa’s Kulula Airlines spent a fortune on a psychedelic new paint scheme, that deed, alone, would make me apprehensive about flying with them.
The brand of an organization is best described as how people who are important to you describe your products or services to others … and also their own, private perceptions of you. A brand is not about an organization.
A brand is reputation … and reputation is something that is earned, not bought.
Brand is about earning and building respect, accountability, trust and engagement … more primal, personal and sometimes intellectual qualities than a new logo, meaningless slogan or coat of whitewash.
A brand is measured by how an organization walks, talks and behaves in today’s world society. Sometimes, a brand can be improved by listening to clients, customers and the marketplace.
Related posts:
- Creating a WOM Airline
- David Meerman Scott: Creating Authoritative Voice
- Just Say, “Creating Jobs for America”
- Southwest: Too Fat to Fly
- How to Salvage Toyota’s Brand Reputation
Category: Featured, Reputation management



















The issue of ‘branding’ has been debated and discussed for years and it still seems that companies, even some of the biggest organizations, still don’t get it. Companies take implusive measures to get attention or ‘sell’ instead of being strategic. It’s just sad.
Hattie,
Thanks for your comment, and I believe you are so right. A “rebranding” mindset too often is akin to a step back to another era of organizational behavior … that too often did not work then and may not work today.
David
So what’s a company to do when it is in the process of changing it’s focus to better take care of it’s customers?
What would be a good first few steps in rebranding?
I think David’s comments are absolutely right, my challenge is what next, because for some companies it needs to happen.
My partner and I were fortunate a few weeks ago to have a phone meeting with one of the most successful and prolific TV producers in Canada, about a television show we produce locally. He inspired us greatly, by asking us a really simple question, with a really challenging answer: “What is your show about?”. When we came up with an answer, he kept going, asking more and more questions until we were at a really granular level of what was the true essence of the show.
In the day to day stress and hustle of producing a TV show, it’s easy to become “too close” to it – we are so focused on the details, that we can no longer step back and see what it really is we’re trying to accomplish.
I think many companies suffer the same problem – they are so mired in the weeds that they can’t step back and see the essence of who they are. Companies and individuals would be well served to spend less time navel gazing and a little more time asking themselves questions that help them to better understand the essence of what they bring to their customers.