United, The Duct Tape Airline

| August 9, 2010 | 6 Comments

TVs on United 903, duct taped in place

I don’t normally write about such things but a couple of recent international flights on United Airlines were troubling, and raised questions in my mind about safety … how much is United cutting back on maintenance and pushing or circumventing the limits of repair standards? Ultimately, I believe it reflects poorly in United’s brand image.

Here’s the background – during a United flight to Munich from Washington Dulles, I noticed how shabby the interior of the 777C appeared. Seats were dirty looking and threadbare … plastic molding was chipped and broken.

I had splurged for business class – seat 13A – but even there, the TV screen was broken, and I noticed how glazed and old looking the windows seemed. Windows were in such poor shape that a clear photo would not have been possible. Both the TV screen and seat were broken at 13B.

Duct tape from the plane's security kit.

I have been flying United for decades but lately, their planes have a tired look about them.

Then, as fate would have it, my return home a couple of weeks later was on the same plane – nose number 2380 and tail “N” number N780UA. I was even in the same seat. And, guess what?! Everything was still broken and more.

Not only was the TV at my seat still broken but many other passengers were complaining that many of the seats in business class didn’t function. The footrest for seat 12B got stuck, requiring the passenger to move to another seat for landing.

Broken business class seat. One of many.

Here’s the troubling part … flight attendants told me that the TV at my seat had been written up in the repair log on my flight to Munich, but nothing had been done to repair it in more than two weeks. They called N780UA a problem 777 and told me of many things broken. The seat, for example, used for pilot rest periods was broken for so many weeks that maintenance people simply took it out of service permanently.

Two United flight attendants try to fix broken business class seat prior to landing. No luck.

They said that United has laid-off many domestic U.S. maintenance people in order to take advantage of cheaper aircraft maintenance in China. But, repairs are not getting done properly in China. In other words, United finds it cheaper to fly big aircraft to third-party maintenance shops in China rather than to use skilled American technicians.

The flight I was on, they said – United 903 – was short two flight attendants, raising safety violation questions.

And, what do the flight attendants do in order to help passengers who encounter broken cabin items? They provide a roll of masking tape. In my case, however, with the broken TV, the copilot had to raid the aircraft’s security kit for something stronger – a roll of duct tape – in order to hold the TV screens in place.

Makes me wonder … if that many things are broken inside N780UA, what about the engines and all the mechanical stuff that keeps the aircraft aloft for long flights over oceans? Scary thought.

A fellow passenger on United 903 told me he had flown to Germany on a Lufthansa flight and found it to be a night and day different experience from United. Lufthansa, he said, was clean, new and everything worked. He added that the Lufthansa plane was also quiet, referring to loud rattles and cracking noises on the United flight.

Category: Featured, Reputation management

Comments (6)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Traytable says:

    Often at an airline experiencing financial difficulty, they will cut back on ‘cosmetic’ items in order to keep essential maintendance at the required level. So yes, the tv screen may be shabby but probably so the engines get a proper looking after.

    I’m not saying it’s right but it would be a stupid airline that cut back on essential maintenance. Duct tape has been an “all-around” fixer in aviation for many many years!

    As for the flight attendant numbers, any sane captain would not dispatch under the minimum required crew numbers. What you may not realise is that the minimum crew required purely for SAFETY is often a lot less than crew required for SERVICE. So, the service may have suffered but the flight can be perfectly legal to depart ‘short’ of crew. ‘Short’ meaning they are operating with less crew than normal, but still within the FAA minimum for that aircraft type.

    • David Henderson says:

      Thanks for the comment. You make a good point. But, it is all about perception, and perception is the highest form of reality among audiences … and, in this case, customers of United Airlines. My perception of United is that of a poorly maintained airline.

      David

  2. Traytable says:

    Fair enough about the perception. There are airlines in Australia that had this problem in the media and it does look bad. No problem, hope the crewing issue is a bit clearer for you now. Would be interested to know what their normal operating crew complement is. On another note, FAA may sometimes grant approval to operate under the minimum crew in extenuating circumstances, but with extra conditions such as reduced passengers numbers, enhanced safety briefing, etc etc…

  3. Rich says:

    Just wait unitl CO and UAL merge:

    Best Case Scenario: CO runs things

    Worst Case: UAL runs things.

  4. Maintenance in China? Holy crap!

  5. David says:

    Yes. But i understand only United’s jumbo jets are maintained in China.

    David

Leave a Reply