<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV News Cutbacks Limit Coverage of News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidhenderson.com/2011/11/29/tv-news-cutbacks-limit-coverage-of-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2011/11/29/tv-news-cutbacks-limit-coverage-of-news/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tv-news-cutbacks-limit-coverage-of-news</link>
	<description>Writer, communications strategist, Emmy Award winning former CBS News correspondent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:13:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2011/11/29/tv-news-cutbacks-limit-coverage-of-news/#comment-33821</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 03:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=10456#comment-33821</guid>
		<description>As a casual observer of the iReport phenomenon I think it&#039;s just an industry recognition and/or capitulation that they will almost never be where they need to be, when they need to be. In a marketplace that values instantanious information, News resources are simply too limited and their area of operation too vast to compete with the speed and reach of Social Media Networks. Wouldn&#039;t it be better to allow the information to be dissiminated organically via Twitter and Youtube and then reach out to the subject matter experts, who can analyze the event and filter out the quintessence from the noise of public discourse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a casual observer of the iReport phenomenon I think it&#8217;s just an industry recognition and/or capitulation that they will almost never be where they need to be, when they need to be. In a marketplace that values instantanious information, News resources are simply too limited and their area of operation too vast to compete with the speed and reach of Social Media Networks. Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to allow the information to be dissiminated organically via Twitter and Youtube and then reach out to the subject matter experts, who can analyze the event and filter out the quintessence from the noise of public discourse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Holmlund</title>
		<link>http://www.davidhenderson.com/2011/11/29/tv-news-cutbacks-limit-coverage-of-news/#comment-31925</link>
		<dc:creator>James Holmlund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidhenderson.com/?p=10456#comment-31925</guid>
		<description>Excellent, David!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, David!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: media.davidhenderson.com

Served from: www.davidhenderson.com @ 2012-05-22 21:28:18 -->
